Trudy Gilmond and Kellie King, both net winners in the Zeek Rewards ponzi, had previously filed a motion to dissolve the receivership. The motion has been denied.
The only reason why they would file such a motion is so they don't have to pay back their ill-gotten gains, i.e. keep the net loser / victim's money. And now, they will have to (eventually, when receiver sue them).
http://www.patrickpretty.com/2013/07/23/urgent-bulletin-moving-federal-judge-denies-alleged-zeek-winners-motion-to-intervene-in-case-and-dissolve-receivership/
The only reason why they would file such a motion is so they don't have to pay back their ill-gotten gains, i.e. keep the net loser / victim's money. And now, they will have to (eventually, when receiver sue them).
http://www.patrickpretty.com/2013/07/23/urgent-bulletin-moving-federal-judge-denies-alleged-zeek-winners-motion-to-intervene-in-case-and-dissolve-receivership/